Iroquois vs Uruguayan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Uruguayan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Uruguayans
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Uruguayan Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,508,545 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.974. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.356% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 356.5 Uruguayans.
![Iroquois Integration in Uruguayan Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-uruguayans/iroquois-vs-uruguayans-community-integration.webp)
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $84,691, a difference of 14.0%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $44,318, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $98,660, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.30%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,228, a difference of 7.7%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $53,680, a difference of 8.7%).
![Iroquois vs Uruguayan Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-uruguayans/iroquois-vs-uruguayans-income.webp)
Income Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Good $44,318 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Fair $100,656 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Average $84,691 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Average $46,190 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Fair $53,680 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Fair $39,228 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Good $52,465 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Fair $93,631 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Fair $98,660 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Poor $59,090 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Excellent 25.2% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 30.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
![Iroquois vs Uruguayan Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-uruguayans/iroquois-vs-uruguayans-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Fair 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Fair 13.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Average 16.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Good 16.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.8% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
![Iroquois vs Uruguayan Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-uruguayans/iroquois-vs-uruguayans-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
![Iroquois vs Uruguayan Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-uruguayans/iroquois-vs-uruguayans-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Excellent 83.1% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 15.4%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
![Iroquois vs Uruguayan Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-uruguayans/iroquois-vs-uruguayans-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Poor 45.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Poor 33.1% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.47%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
![Iroquois vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-uruguayans/iroquois-vs-uruguayans-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 11.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 88.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 52.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.3%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
![Iroquois vs Uruguayan Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-uruguayans/iroquois-vs-uruguayans-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 94.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.4% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 88.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Poor 64.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Fair 58.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Average 46.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Good 38.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 40.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%).
![Iroquois vs Uruguayan Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-uruguayans/iroquois-vs-uruguayans-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |