Iroquois vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Potawatomi

Fair
Fair
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Potawatomi Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,968,311 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 23.1 Potawatomi.
Iroquois Integration in Potawatomi Communities

Iroquois vs Potawatomi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.6%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $34,739, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $84,613, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $54,212, a difference of 0.88%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $48,768, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $46,462, a difference of 2.0%).
Iroquois vs Potawatomi Income
Income MetricIroquoisPotawatomi
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$38,046
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$88,265
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$72,576
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Tragic
$41,288
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$48,768
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Tragic
$34,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$46,462
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$81,774
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$84,613
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$54,212
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
27.7%

Iroquois vs Potawatomi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Iroquois vs Potawatomi Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisPotawatomi
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
23.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
34.1%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Poor
12.5%

Iroquois vs Potawatomi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Iroquois vs Potawatomi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisPotawatomi
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Iroquois vs Potawatomi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
Iroquois vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisPotawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
62.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
80.0%

Iroquois vs Potawatomi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.4%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.21%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Iroquois vs Potawatomi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisPotawatomi
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
36.2%

Iroquois vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.5%).
Iroquois vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisPotawatomi
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.3%

Iroquois vs Potawatomi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.7%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.030%), ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Iroquois vs Potawatomi Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisPotawatomi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Average
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
54.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
40.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.6%

Iroquois vs Potawatomi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Iroquois vs Potawatomi Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisPotawatomi
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%