Iroquois vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Ecuadorians
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,723,368 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 92.2 Ecuadorians.
Iroquois vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,911, a difference of 13.8%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $82,070, a difference of 10.5%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $54,958, a difference of 2.3%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $51,596, a difference of 4.5%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $95,114, a difference of 5.1%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Iroquois vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.9% |
Iroquois vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Iroquois vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 82.3% |
Iroquois vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.8%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.62%), currently married (44.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Poor 33.3% |
Iroquois vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 107.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 30.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Iroquois vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 57.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (42.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Iroquois vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.5%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |