Iroquois vs Crow Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Crow
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Crow
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Crow Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,547,179 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.851. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.191% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 191.2 Crow.
![Iroquois Integration in Crow Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-crow/iroquois-vs-crow-community-integration.webp)
Iroquois vs Crow Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.6%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $31,729, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $76,605, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,012, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $35,266, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $49,234, a difference of 9.1%).
![Iroquois vs Crow Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-crow/iroquois-vs-crow-income.webp)
Income Metric | Iroquois | Crow |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $31,729 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $76,605 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $63,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $38,707 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $42,434 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $35,266 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Tragic $47,012 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $71,337 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $74,257 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $49,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Iroquois vs Crow Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 73.6%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 70.7%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.95%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 13.8%).
![Iroquois vs Crow Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-crow/iroquois-vs-crow-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Crow |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 20.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 19.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 33.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 31.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 23.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 32.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 9.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Iroquois vs Crow Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 242.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 238.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 210.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.1%).
![Iroquois vs Crow Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-crow/iroquois-vs-crow-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Crow |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 10.6% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 20.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 17.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 16.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Iroquois vs Crow Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
![Iroquois vs Crow Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-crow/iroquois-vs-crow-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Crow |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 60.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 38.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 78.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 78.3% |
Iroquois vs Crow Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 35.0%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.82, a difference of 21.1%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.9%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.6%).
![Iroquois vs Crow Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-crow/iroquois-vs-crow-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Crow |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 41.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.82 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 40.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 40.4% |
Iroquois vs Crow Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
![Iroquois vs Crow Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-crow/iroquois-vs-crow-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Crow |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Fair 89.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Good 55.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Iroquois vs Crow Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.3%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and 9th grade (95.4% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
![Iroquois vs Crow Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-crow/iroquois-vs-crow-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Crow |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 99.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 99.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 99.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 99.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 99.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 99.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 99.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 99.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 99.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 27.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Iroquois vs Crow Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 1.8%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
![Iroquois vs Crow Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/iroquois-vs-crow/iroquois-vs-crow-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Crow |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 49.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Fair 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Poor 2.5% |