Iroquois vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Creek
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,054,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 10.0 Creek.
Iroquois vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $74,847, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $78,960, a difference of 10.5%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $35,546, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $51,949, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $45,371, a difference of 4.4%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $46,594, a difference of 6.0%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 27.1% |
Iroquois vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.2%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 5.5%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Creek |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Iroquois vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.75%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Creek |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Iroquois vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 77.7% |
Iroquois vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.0%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Creek |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 37.6% |
Iroquois vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Iroquois vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Creek communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.3% |
Iroquois vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.9%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.5%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Creek |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.8% |