Iroquois vs Comanche Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Comanche
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Comanche
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Comanche Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,838,235 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.779. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 49.4 Comanche.
Iroquois vs Comanche Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $38,088, a difference of 2.7%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $48,202, a difference of 2.4%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $88,556, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.16%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,518, a difference of 0.29%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $73,747, a difference of 0.72%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Comanche |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $38,088 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $88,556 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $73,747 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $41,519 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $48,202 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $35,661 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Tragic $47,518 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $82,152 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $85,787 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $54,922 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Excellent 25.0% |
Iroquois vs Comanche Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Comanche |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 21.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 33.9% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Iroquois vs Comanche Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Comanche |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 20.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Iroquois vs Comanche Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.69%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Comanche |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 37.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 79.2% |
Iroquois vs Comanche Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.0%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.60%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Comanche |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 36.7% |
Iroquois vs Comanche Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.9%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Comanche |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Excellent 56.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Iroquois vs Comanche Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.5%), associate's degree (42.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Comanche |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Good 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Fair 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 61.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 39.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Iroquois vs Comanche Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.92%), disability (13.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Comanche |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 28.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 51.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |