Iroquois vs Australian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Australian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Australians
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,058
SOCIAL INDEX
88.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
32nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Australian Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,563,118 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 61.8 Australians.
Iroquois vs Australian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $52,074, a difference of 33.2%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $118,440, a difference of 30.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $113,533, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,739, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $43,308, a difference of 19.0%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Australian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Exceptional $52,074 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Exceptional $118,440 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Exceptional $96,490 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Exceptional $52,294 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Exceptional $62,857 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Exceptional $43,308 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Exceptional $53,739 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Exceptional $107,912 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Exceptional $113,533 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Exceptional $66,891 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 28.2% |
Iroquois vs Australian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Australian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 42.0%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.5%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.6%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Australian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Excellent 20.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Iroquois vs Australian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Australian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Iroquois vs Australian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Australian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 37.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Fair 82.5% |
Iroquois vs Australian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.82%), family households (62.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Australian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Iroquois vs Australian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.92%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Australian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Excellent 6.6% |
Iroquois vs Australian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 59.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 50.1%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Australian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 70.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Iroquois vs Australian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.4%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Australian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Average 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |