Immigrants vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,311,492 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $77,465, a difference of 29.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $116,156, a difference of 16.2%), and median family income ($100,962 compared to $116,188, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.1%), median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $56,872, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($46,478 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 65.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.8%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.31%), family households (66.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 89.3%), college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and college, 1 year or more (57.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.51%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.3%).