Immigrants from Uruguay vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,205,241 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 48.5 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $61,797, a difference of 8.5%), per capita income ($43,997 compared to $47,284, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $49,267, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 0.15%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $40,060, a difference of 2.9%), and median earnings ($45,682 compared to $47,023, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 29.4%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.73%), female poverty (14.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and poverty (12.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.1%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 0.26%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.5%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 0.85%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.9%).