Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
White/Caucasian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Whites/Caucasians
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
White/Caucasian Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,525,957 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.256% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 255.5 Whites/Caucasians.
Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $58,847, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $82,029, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $53,925, a difference of 3.3%), median earnings ($47,617 compared to $45,197, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $98,091, a difference of 5.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | White/Caucasian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Poor $42,180 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Poor $99,800 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Poor $82,029 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Poor $45,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Fair $53,925 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Tragic $37,531 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Tragic $50,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Poor $91,668 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Fair $98,091 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Tragic $58,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Tragic 28.5% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.9%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.080%), family poverty (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | White/Caucasian |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | White/Caucasian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | White/Caucasian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 8.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.14, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | White/Caucasian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | White/Caucasian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.6%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | White/Caucasian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 44.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Tragic 35.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | White/Caucasian |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |