Immigrants from Oceania vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Houma
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,623,113 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.964. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 57.8 Houma.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 50.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $44,822, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $50,547, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $44,356, a difference of 21.0%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $38,949, a difference of 22.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Tragic 38.7% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 89.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 73.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 33.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Houma |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 63.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 54.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Houma |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 74.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 52.3%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Houma |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Tragic 46.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 55.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 106.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 99.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 85.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.45%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.52%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 0.96% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 66.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 64.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Houma |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 3.0% |