Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Laos

Ute

Fair
Fair
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,611,282 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Ute.
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Ute Communities

Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 16.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $83,937, a difference of 8.3%), and median household income ($78,327 compared to $72,402, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $49,997, a difference of 0.090%), median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $48,899, a difference of 0.60%), and per capita income ($37,857 compared to $36,651, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LaosUte
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,857
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,239
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,327
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,884
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,190
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,841
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,041
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,553
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,909
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,722
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Tragic
27.8%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.5%), single female poverty (22.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 6.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.8%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LaosUte
Poverty
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LaosUte
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LaosUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.6%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
76.6%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.9%), family households with children (29.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.49, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LaosUte
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.0%
Poor
33.0%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LaosUte
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.4%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.19%), high school diploma (86.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and 11th grade (90.5% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LaosUte
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.7%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.0%

Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 45.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LaosUte
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.5%