Immigrants from Laos vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,849,111 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($92,239 compared to $72,193, a difference of 27.8%), median household income ($78,327 compared to $61,663, a difference of 27.0%), and per capita income ($37,857 compared to $30,256, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $45,248, a difference of 10.6%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $33,205, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 100.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 97.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 88.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 40.8%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 46.2%), and single female poverty (22.9% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 49.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 98.8%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 86.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 83.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 29.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 46.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 33.7%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.8%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.53, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 91.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.2%), bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 29.5%), and associate's degree (40.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.1% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.40%), 9th grade (93.2% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and 7th grade (94.5% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 74.2%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 39.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.9%).