Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,652,645 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 7.4 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $47,394, a difference of 25.2%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $108,830, a difference of 18.0%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $57,352, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $63,643, a difference of 12.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Exceptional $47,394 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Exceptional $108,830 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Exceptional $89,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Exceptional $48,913 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Exceptional $57,352 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Exceptional $41,527 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Fair $51,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Excellent $97,880 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Exceptional $104,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Exceptional $63,643 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 38.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.8%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.5%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.3%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 68.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 62.5%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Exceptional 68.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Exceptional 63.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 42.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.8%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |