Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,994,999 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 71.4 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $50,555, a difference of 33.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $119,094, a difference of 31.0%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $120,263, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $54,512, a difference of 8.9%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $44,161, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 44.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 35.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.6%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 103.1%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 90.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 37.2%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 6.8%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.7%).