Immigrants from Laos vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,748,394 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.224% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 224.2 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 15.1%), median household income ($78,327 compared to $72,682, a difference of 7.8%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $34,742, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $48,669, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($37,857 compared to $37,203, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($42,884 compared to $41,252, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 30.4%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.55%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.4%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.56%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.51%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 81.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), ged/equivalency (82.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.47%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.7%).