Immigrants from Hong Kong vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,798,637 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 18.5 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $78,911, a difference of 62.4%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $71,853, a difference of 55.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $82,736, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.5%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $47,448, a difference of 30.8%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $36,424, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 85.0%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 81.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 50.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 78.1%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 67.9%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (66.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 39.5%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 87.6%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 74.9%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.11%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 56.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 45.8%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.7%).