Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Ukrainian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 242,102,398 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.065% in Ukrainians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 65.4 Ukrainians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $102,451, a difference of 25.1%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $91,456, a difference of 21.9%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $42,015, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $63,032, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $53,843, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 26.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.4%), male poverty (9.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and poverty (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 25.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 24.0%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 6.2%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.94%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.4%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.88%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.8%).