Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

South American Indians

Good
Average
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

South American Indian Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,574,357 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 0.7 South American Indians.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in South American Indian Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $96,497, a difference of 32.8%), median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $54,508, a difference of 28.7%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $44,206, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $62,215, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,979, a difference of 17.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSouth American Indian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Good
$44,206
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Good
$103,624
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Excellent
$87,446
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Good
$46,952
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Average
$54,508
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Good
$40,019
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Excellent
$52,979
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Good
$96,497
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Good
$101,171
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Good
$62,215
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Exceptional
24.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 39.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 35.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.36%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 10.3%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSouth American Indian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
12.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Fair
11.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Average
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Average
11.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSouth American Indian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.5%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.68%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSouth American Indian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Good
82.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 34.6%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 33.0%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSouth American Indian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Average
31.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSouth American Indian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Average
6.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.5%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (94.1% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and 8th grade (94.9% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSouth American Indian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
92.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Average
65.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Good
60.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Excellent
39.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Excellent
15.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs South American Indian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongSouth American Indian
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Good
23.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%