Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,103,655 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.427. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.263% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 263.0 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $65,996, a difference of 94.2%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $59,197, a difference of 88.4%), and median family income ($131,067 compared to $70,423, a difference of 86.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 36.4%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $39,726, a difference of 56.3%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $31,560, a difference of 57.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 185.6%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 180.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 177.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 71.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 80.6%), and single mother poverty (24.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 82.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 116.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 93.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 92.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 93.7%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 80.7%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.28, a difference of 0.60%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.2%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 98.2%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 97.6%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 83.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.12%), 4th grade (96.9% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 114.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 94.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 92.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 13.8%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 32.8%).