Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,418,552 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.104% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 103.8 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $96,866, a difference of 32.3%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $86,084, a difference of 29.5%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $38,802, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 13.4%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $53,127, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $61,104, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and single female poverty (16.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), poverty (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 51.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.3%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.23%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 75.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 100.5%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.0%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 77.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%).