Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,754,050 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 6.2 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $104,578, a difference of 22.5%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $93,971, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,540, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $65,326, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $111,602, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 25.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.8%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 18.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.15%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.7%), bachelor's degree (48.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.080%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.26%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%).