Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,168,476 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 8.2 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $95,698, a difference of 33.9%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $87,553, a difference of 27.4%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $45,043, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $61,976, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,374, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 42.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 38.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.40%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 48.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.9%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.75%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (66.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.1%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.71%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.0%).