Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from South Central Asia
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,052,377 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.681% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 681.2 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 14.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $116,626, a difference of 9.9%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $52,660, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $68,960, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $70,103, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $124,188, a difference of 2.7%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $56,709 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $131,067 | Exceptional $125,956 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $111,519 | Exceptional $106,057 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $59,433 | Exceptional $57,114 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $70,146 | Exceptional $68,960 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $49,818 | Exceptional $46,324 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $62,083 | Exceptional $57,818 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $128,140 | Exceptional $116,626 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $127,500 | Exceptional $124,188 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,567 | Exceptional $70,103 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.5% | Tragic 29.3% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and female poverty (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.5% | Exceptional 17.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.4% | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.4% | Exceptional 80.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.5% | Tragic 34.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.6% | Tragic 74.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.93%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.6% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Exceptional 50.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 23.6% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 32.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.92%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.6% | Exceptional 56.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.2% | Fair 19.3% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.6%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (48.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.28%), associate's degree (55.4% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.70%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.7% | Good 2.0% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Good 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Good 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Good 98.0% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Good 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Good 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Good 97.6% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Good 97.5% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Good 97.2% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Excellent 96.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Excellent 96.1% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.5% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Average 89.3% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 88.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.0% | Exceptional 72.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.4% | Exceptional 55.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.2% | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.060%), disability (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.95% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 20.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Exceptional 46.0% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |