Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,570,697 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 50.9 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $108,751, a difference of 17.8%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $96,378, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $113,215, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.3%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $52,044, a difference of 9.0%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $63,326, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 20.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.59%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 15.2%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 33.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and bachelor's degree (48.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.54%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.8%).