Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Immigrants from Lithuania

Good
Exceptional
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,757,404 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 8.5 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $108,149, a difference of 18.5%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $96,836, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $43,317, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $66,087, a difference of 8.3%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $51,361, a difference of 10.4%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $63,346, a difference of 10.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Tragic
28.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.23%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and poverty (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.57%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 17.7%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 60.0%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (71.0% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%