Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Ireland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,272,451 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Immigrants from Ireland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 39.6 Immigrants from Ireland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $57,075, a difference of 8.8%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $104,692, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $120,333, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($56,709 compared to $56,584, a difference of 0.22%), median family income ($131,067 compared to $127,584, a difference of 2.7%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $67,698, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and single male poverty (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.97%), female poverty (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and poverty (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.24%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 15.4%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (48.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.8%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and high school diploma (89.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (71.0% compared to 71.0%, a difference of 0.030%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and college, 1 year or more (66.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%).