Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Egypt Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,128,875 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Egypt. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 3.7 Immigrants from Egypt.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $103,192, a difference of 24.2%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $47,361, a difference of 19.7%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $93,700, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $64,299, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $54,239, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 22.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.75%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.55%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.5%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.24%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.45%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.7%).