Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Ecuador
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Ecuador
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,754,127 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 51.2 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $89,673, a difference of 42.9%), median family income ($131,067 compared to $92,837, a difference of 41.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $91,462, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $53,722, a difference of 15.6%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $38,644, a difference of 28.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $56,709 | Tragic $41,195 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $131,067 | Tragic $92,837 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $111,519 | Tragic $80,341 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $59,433 | Tragic $44,462 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $70,146 | Tragic $50,474 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $49,818 | Poor $38,644 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $62,083 | Exceptional $53,722 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $128,140 | Tragic $89,673 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $127,500 | Tragic $91,462 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,567 | Tragic $54,030 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.5% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 65.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 62.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.8%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and single male poverty (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.5% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 19.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 19.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.2% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.4% | Tragic 31.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 41.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Tragic 20.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Excellent 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.8% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 0.93%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.4% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.5% | Tragic 31.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.6% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 82.2% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 51.8%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 43.1%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.60%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.6% | Tragic 42.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 23.6% | Tragic 33.7% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 110.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 16.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Tragic 23.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.6% | Tragic 40.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 4.2% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 97.0%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 68.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 95.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 93.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Tragic 93.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Tragic 91.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 90.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Tragic 89.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.3% | Tragic 84.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 81.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.0% | Tragic 58.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.4% | Tragic 42.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.2% | Tragic 34.7% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Disability | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.95% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 19.9% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.0% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |