Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,105,756 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 41.6 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($131,067 compared to $78,249, a difference of 67.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $76,701, a difference of 67.1%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $68,461, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 14.2%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $50,374, a difference of 23.2%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $33,291, a difference of 49.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 129.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 62.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.3%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and single male poverty (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 75.9%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 55.7%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (66.1% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 29.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 135.8%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 88.4%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 78.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.16%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%).