Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Good
Fair
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,134,391 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.161% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 161.0 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $86,736, a difference of 47.7%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $39,827, a difference of 42.4%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $78,682, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $57,114, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $48,749, a difference of 27.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Exceptional
22.8%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 63.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 59.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 15.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.97%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.96%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 45.8%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 39.5%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.98%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (66.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Poor
32.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 62.3%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.9%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.50%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Poor
1.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 49.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.0%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%