Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,944,975 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.443. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.456% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 2,455.8 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $80,515, a difference of 59.2%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $35,688, a difference of 58.9%), and median family income ($131,067 compared to $85,647, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $50,279, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $52,832, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 74.9%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 74.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 71.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.4%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 56.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 63.6%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 60.2%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.41, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 111.0%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 102.2%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 49.5%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.6%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 8.8%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.5%).