Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Fijian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Fijians
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Fijian Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,476,386 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.137% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 136.9 Fijians.
![Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Fijian Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians-community-integration.webp)
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $79,956, a difference of 60.3%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $36,690, a difference of 54.6%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $45,607, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $50,132, a difference of 23.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $56,768, a difference of 26.1%).
![Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians-income.webp)
Income Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Fijian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $56,709 | Tragic $36,690 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $131,067 | Tragic $87,387 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $111,519 | Tragic $74,205 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $59,433 | Tragic $40,193 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $70,146 | Tragic $45,607 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $49,818 | Tragic $35,114 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $62,083 | Tragic $50,132 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $128,140 | Tragic $79,956 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $127,500 | Tragic $85,187 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,567 | Tragic $56,768 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.5% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 60.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 53.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 10.1%).
![Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Fijian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.5% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 18.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 60.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
![Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Fijian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 3.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
![Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Fijian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.4% | Tragic 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.6% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 80.2% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 63.9%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 48.8%), and births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
![Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Fijian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.6% | Fair 46.1% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.36 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 23.6% | Fair 32.3% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.7%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.1%).
![Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Fijian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Exceptional 90.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.6% | Exceptional 57.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 145.8%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 119.0%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 98.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
![Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Fijian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 94.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Tragic 93.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 91.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Tragic 90.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 88.2% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.3% | Tragic 86.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.0% | Tragic 57.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 51.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.4% | Tragic 37.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.2% | Tragic 28.7% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 10.3% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 1.1% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 61.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.8%).
![Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Fijian Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians/immigrants-from-hong-kong-vs-fijians-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Fijian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.95% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 27.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |