Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,489,314 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 81.3 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $96,824, a difference of 32.3%), median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $56,243, a difference of 24.7%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $89,640, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $64,989, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $43,243, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $53,818, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 34.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.3%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.67%), and family households (66.1% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.1%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.7%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.1%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (96.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.46%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.69%).