Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Eastern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,732,461 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.083% in Eastern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 83.2 Eastern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $54,066, a difference of 14.8%), wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $114,523, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $70,470, a difference of 1.6%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $55,780, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($131,067 compared to $125,546, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 21.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.16%), male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 17.7%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.010%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.31%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 73.7%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.16%), associate's degree (55.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and college, under 1 year (71.0% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 44.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 3.7%).