Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,329,698 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 13.5 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Crow communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $71,337, a difference of 79.6%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $31,729, a difference of 78.7%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $63,681, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $47,012, a difference of 32.1%), wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 33.9%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $35,266, a difference of 41.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Crow communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 149.4%), single male poverty (10.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 122.7%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 122.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 24.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 37.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 257.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 230.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 229.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 91.8%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 71.2%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.66%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.82, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.62%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Crow communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 102.9%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 92.4%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 87.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.70%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 78.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 58.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.2%).