Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,404,081 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 23.5 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $82,355, a difference of 55.6%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $37,699, a difference of 50.4%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $74,847, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $48,643, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $53,232, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 92.4%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 87.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 85.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 36.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 65.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 65.3%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 56.5%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.35, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.62%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 0.10%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 81.6%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 76.5%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 68.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 58.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 8.7%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.7%).