Immigrants from Hong Kong vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,626,312 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of British within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.169% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 169.1 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and British communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $98,359, a difference of 30.3%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $88,914, a difference of 25.4%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $39,772, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $63,940, a difference of 11.9%), wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $106,264, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and British communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 30.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and single female poverty (16.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.1%), male poverty (9.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 30.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 32.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 30.7%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 48.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 4.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and British communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 77.7%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.2%).