Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Black/African American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,650,773 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.538. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.627% in Blacks/African Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 1,626.7 Blacks/African Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $73,370, a difference of 74.7%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $67,573, a difference of 65.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $78,556, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $44,381, a difference of 39.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $50,779, a difference of 40.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 106.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 101.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 100.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 77.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 58.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 87.9%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 85.9%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (66.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 92.3%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 88.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 9th grade (94.1% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 79.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 57.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 18.8%).