Immigrants from Guyana vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,584,176 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to an increase of 63.1 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 40.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,495 compared to $62,330, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $51,713, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $90,951, a difference of 0.85%), median male earnings ($50,321 compared to $49,748, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,586 compared to $88,446, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 33.9%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.6%), male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 55.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 50.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 65.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.3%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.5%), average family size (3.40 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 137.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 95.2%), and no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 89.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 21.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 57.7%), and no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 89.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 112.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and bachelor's degree (33.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 129.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 72.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.6%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.3%).