Immigrants from Guatemala vs Samoan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Samoan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Samoans
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Samoan Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,246,573 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.396. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 9.4 Samoans.
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Samoan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $65,427, a difference of 21.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $101,580, a difference of 17.3%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $37,498, a difference of 5.8%), per capita income ($37,550 compared to $39,826, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $54,610, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Samoan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,550 | Tragic $39,826 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,191 | Fair $100,344 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,123 | Good $86,498 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,851 | Tragic $44,206 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,244 | Tragic $51,389 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,444 | Tragic $37,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,447 | Exceptional $54,610 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,341 | Fair $92,385 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,573 | Good $101,580 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,950 | Exceptional $65,427 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Fair 26.0% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Samoan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 47.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 39.4%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.5%), single female poverty (24.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 17.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Samoan |
Poverty | Tragic 15.5% | Good 12.0% |
Families | Tragic 12.0% | Good 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.6% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.9% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.1% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.3% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.6% | Fair 12.1% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Samoan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.4%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Samoan |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Average 5.4% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Samoan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.39%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Samoan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 81.8% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Samoan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.3%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.42, a difference of 0.30%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Samoan |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 67.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.8% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.8% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Exceptional 3.42 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.5% | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 26.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Samoan |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 25.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Samoan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 58.2%), college, under 1 year (56.2% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and college, 1 year or more (50.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Samoan |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 90.7% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.4% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.4% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 85.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.0% | Fair 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.4% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.9% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 63.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.1% | Tragic 41.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 31.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Samoan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.81%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Samoan |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.1% | Tragic 49.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Poor 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |