Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Chickasaw
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from El Salvador Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,668,592 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $44,763, a difference of 22.0%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and median household income ($81,213 compared to $70,005, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.30%), median earnings ($42,413 compared to $40,672, a difference of 4.3%), and per capita income ($38,394 compared to $36,475, a difference of 5.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,394 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,545 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $81,213 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,413 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,973 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,673 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,599 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $86,913 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,176 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,226 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 29.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 26.9%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 21.9%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.19, a difference of 9.4%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.36%), married-couple households (44.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (67.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.0% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.49 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.1% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 128.8%), high school diploma (80.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and 10th grade (86.8% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and kindergarten (96.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 86.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 85.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 80.8% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.0% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 73.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 59.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |