Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Jordanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,897,321 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 3.9 Jordanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $99,186, a difference of 19.0%), per capita income ($53,806 compared to $45,605, a difference of 18.0%), and median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $58,500, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $64,313, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $51,796, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 15.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.47%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.8%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.63%), and married-couple households (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 58.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.8%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.5%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 0.32%), high school diploma (89.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.59%).