Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Laotians
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,858,943 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 25.7 Laotians.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $47,041, a difference of 10.1%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $59,351, a difference of 4.8%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $50,343, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $54,369, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $66,306, a difference of 0.11%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $94,990, a difference of 0.35%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Poor 26.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.32%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.61%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Laotian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Laotian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.74%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.28%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Laotian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.0%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.6%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Laotian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Excellent 2.4% |