Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Uruguay
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Uruguay
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,806
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
209th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,799,378 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.704% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 704.4 Immigrants from Uruguay.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($116,165 compared to $98,205, a difference of 18.3%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $52,860, a difference of 17.7%), and per capita income ($51,770 compared to $43,997, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $52,302, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $38,945, a difference of 11.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Uruguay |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Average $43,997 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Tragic $98,205 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Poor $82,560 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Fair $45,682 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Poor $52,860 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Poor $38,945 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Average $52,302 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Poor $91,171 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Poor $96,086 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Tragic $56,975 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 29.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Uruguay |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Poor 9.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Poor 14.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Fair 17.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Fair 16.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Poor 17.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Fair 16.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Poor 12.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Uruguay |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Average 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Uruguay |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Uruguay |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 33.9% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Uruguay |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 88.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 51.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.3%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.7%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Uruguay |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 93.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 92.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 91.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 87.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Tragic 84.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Tragic 63.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Poor 58.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Average 37.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Average 15.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Uruguay Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.36%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.97%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Uruguay |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 46.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Poor 2.2% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Excellent 2.4% |