Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Chickasaw
3,937
SOCIAL INDEX
36.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
208th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Costa Rica Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,346,334 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $82,193, a difference of 21.8%), median household income ($85,054 compared to $70,005, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $77,929, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 9.9%), median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $47,832, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $53,732, a difference of 11.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,464 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,354 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,054 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,928 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,237 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,186 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,643 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,876 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $100,141 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,848 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 31.1%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and single female poverty (20.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Fair 9.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Good 20.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Poor 5.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 9.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.18%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.26 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.5%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.68%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 45.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 5.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |