Immigrants from China vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,166,365 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $92,241, a difference of 29.8%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $83,193, a difference of 26.6%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $43,621, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $60,608, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,447, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 31.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 29.7%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 34.9%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 87.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.7%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 57.0%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 73.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 47.7%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.8%).