Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Ute

Good
Fair
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,485,920 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.966. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.229% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 229.4 Ute.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Ute Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $36,651, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $83,937, a difference of 23.2%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $72,402, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $49,997, a difference of 4.9%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $48,899, a difference of 14.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileUte
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Tragic
27.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (11.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 46.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 43.2%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileUte
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.3%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileUte
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
76.6%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.0%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.49, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileUte
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Poor
33.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileUte
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.1%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 32.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.29%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileUte
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 49.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileUte
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%