Immigrants from Chile vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Houma
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,114,058 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 7.1 Houma.
Immigrants from Chile vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 50.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.4%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $62,575, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $50,547, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $44,356, a difference of 18.2%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $38,949, a difference of 22.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,213 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,655 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,388 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,697 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,954 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,353 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,440 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,159 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,412 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,354 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.7% | Tragic 38.7% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 94.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 74.1%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Houma |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.7% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 76.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 40.0%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Houma |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Average 5.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.8% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 74.1% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 49.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Houma |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Tragic 46.6% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.42%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.2% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 137.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 119.6%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 111.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.50%), 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and 5th grade (97.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.9% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.4% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 0.96% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 84.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 67.8%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Houma |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |