Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Choctaw
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,620,881 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Choctaw.
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $35,999, a difference of 28.4%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $69,947, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $82,287, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $45,450, a difference of 15.4%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $47,729, a difference of 17.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,213 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,655 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,388 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,697 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,954 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,353 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,440 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,159 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,412 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,354 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.7% | Tragic 28.1% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 42.8%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 18.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Choctaw |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.7% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Average 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 78.2% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.7%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.67%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Choctaw |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Tragic 36.9% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.2% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.1%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 52.0%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.9% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.4% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 62.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Choctaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |